Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into your mouth, therefore you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.
In addition to the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes in the marketplace could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially decrease the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in Element Vape Coupon turn means that fewer people will purchase them.